HP EliteBook 745 G2

Performance Results

Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 745 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 221C
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150722
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 18 '18 at 19:51
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD A8 PRO-7150B R5, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
34.1% Below average
Memory 51.3
1-Core 39.3
2-Core 63.9
34% 51.5 Pts
4-Core 100
8-Core 99.9
14% 99.9 Pts
64-Core 94.2
6% 94.2 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 221C) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
2.98% Terrible
Lighting 3.53
Reflection 4.69
Parallax 4.28
3% 4.17 fps
MRender 5.05
Gravity 3.77
Splatting 6.96
3% 5.26 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.98%
Great: 4%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB6S-128G-1006 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3511006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 168 162 168 149 161 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 388
Write 284
Mixed 213
SusWrite 164
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 28.6
4K Mixed 19.3
63% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 139
105% 144 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HP16D3LS1KBG/4G Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6N1 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.6% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 10.2
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6.9
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical EliteBook 745 G2 Builds (Compare 258 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 745 G2

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $187Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $153Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback