Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 18 '18 at 19:28
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 54.5
2-Core 110
55% 85.5 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 212
28% 211 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.4% Above average
Lighting 67.3
Reflection 68.3
Parallax 66.8
55% 67.5 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 63.7
Splatting 54.1
50% 62.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 381 411 422 332 215 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 430
Mixed 426
SusWrite 354
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 46.4
153% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 239
DQ Mixed 222
174% 241 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 100%
Great: 123%
Seagate ST500DM005 HD502HJ 500GB
345GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 75 76 77 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 107
Write 50.5
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 76.1
54% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 77%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
211GB free
Firmware: 01.00A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 75 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 91.5
Write 88
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 75.5
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 54%
WDC WD10 02FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
849GB free, PID 0277
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 36.2
Write 38
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 14.3
40% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
129% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 17%
ST350031 2CS 500GB
4GB free, PID 0277
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 37.8
Write 37.7
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 14.2
38% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 19%
WDC WD50 00AADS-56S9B1 500GB
149GB free, PID 0370
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.4% Very poor
Read 37.8
Write 34
Mixed 26
SusWrite 13.9
36% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
41.6% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 15.3
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback