PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 53.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A99X EVO (all builds) |
Memory | 12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130410 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Dec 18 '18 at 19:28 |
Run Duration | 182 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 9% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
|
63.8%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35
|
53.4%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 381 411 422 332 215 MB/s
|
100%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate ST500DM005 HD502HJ 500GB
345GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 75 76 77 75 MB/s
|
52.6%
Above average
|
|||
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
211GB free
Firmware: 01.00A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 75 76 76 76 MB/s
|
47.9%
Average
|
|||
WDC WD10 02FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
849GB free, PID 0277
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
|
16.9%
Very poor
|
|||
ST350031 2CS 500GB
4GB free, PID 0277
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
|
13.3%
Very poor
|
|||
WDC WD50 00AADS-56S9B1 500GB
149GB free, PID 0370
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
|
11.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
41.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 74x |
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples | 50x |
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples | 35x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 14x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 14x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $517 |