HP 22-3001la

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 22-3001la  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B3C
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150304
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 18 '18 at 18:38
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160T
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 83.1
1-Core 89.4
2-Core 155
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 203
28% 210 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 2B3C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.11% Terrible
Lighting 3.33
Reflection 5.27
Parallax 4.19
3% 4.26 fps
MRender 3.67
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.22
4% 4.38 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.11%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP51
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 170
Write 166
Mixed 77.7
102% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 24 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 8.8
Write 22
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 23.6
26% 17.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 0.4
235% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
24.9% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 7.2
22% 7.87 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7
19% 6.73 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback