bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DB75EN
Memory7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130704
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateDec 18 '18 at 14:47
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 105
2-Core 205
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 500
54% 431 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Lighting 38.9
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 36.8
32% 35.4 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 37.6
Splatting 35.5
30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 256GB-$225
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HTRAN101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 96 88 93 84 80 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.2% Average
Read 250
Write 234
Mixed 197
SusWrite 92.8
43% 194 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 27.2
82% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 131
108% 156 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 106%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
40GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 71 69 72 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 74
Write 80.8
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 70.7
51% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
77GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 108 108 110 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 102
Write 99.3
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 108
68% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/8G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
44.9% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 13.6
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.7
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,252 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback