PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 74.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7B38 |
Motherboard | MSI A320M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7B38) (all builds) |
Memory | 5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180427 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 17 '18 at 22:00 |
Run Duration | 170 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 48% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A10-9700 APU (2016 M.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
49.9%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.35
|
27.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
395GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 282 282 284 286 279 MB/s
|
74.6%
Very good
|
|||
Philips USB Flash Drive 32GB
9GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 3.7 2.4 2.8 4.3 3.6 MB/s
|
2.09%
Terrible
|
|||
ST1000DM 003-9YN162 1TB
834GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 32 32 31 30 MB/s
|
17.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.C8FE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
31.8%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 49x |
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples | 41x |
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 28x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 49x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 25x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 18x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 94% - Outstanding | Total price: $233 |