Lenovo 20BFS14B06

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 20BFS14B06  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20BFS14B06
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160316
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 29 '16 at 13:48
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4800MQ-$150
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 103
2-Core 200
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 500
54% 430 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 2210) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4139
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.77% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 6.96
Parallax 6.5
3% 5.82 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 8
5% 5.55 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.77%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TD256HAFV-000L7 256GB
142GB free
Firmware: DXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
71% Very good
Read 475
Write 237
Mixed 207
67% 306 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 12.6
89% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 33.5
88% 190 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 71%
Great: 80%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 541A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 475
Write 137
Mixed 197
59% 269 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 74
4K Mixed 11.1
80% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 37.8
54% 98.9 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 85%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
15GB free, PID a83a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 147
Write 13.9
Mixed 36
59% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 1.22
4K Mixed 0.91
101% 3.24 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 30%
Kingston DataTraveler R3.0 G2 USB 3.0 32GB-$30
9GB free, PID 16a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
26% Poor
Read 124
Write 16.8
Mixed 11.6
42% 50.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.83
4K Write 0.96
4K Mixed 0.5
71% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 26%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.2% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 7.7
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 9.5
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback