Medion MS-7797

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Medion MS-7797 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION MS-7797
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121213
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 17 '18 at 09:17
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$79 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Memory 87.6 1-Core 79.7 2-Core 155 65% 107 Pts	4-Core 225 8-Core 229 30% 227 Pts	64-Core 229 14% 229 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% MSI(1462 2802) 1GB CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 390.77 Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 8% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 268GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC4G SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 102 103 111 113 111 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 27.3 Write 126 Mixed 25.5 SusWrite 103 51% 70.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 114%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB 18,390 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2GB free Firmware: 0304 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5 5.1 5.1 5 5.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 40.7 Write 35.8 Mixed 33.1 SusWrite 5.1 22% 28.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 63%
Samsung S2 Portable 3 1TB 612 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 930GB free, PID 60a8 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5 5 5 5 5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 37.5 Write 37.7 Mixed 32.9 SusWrite 5.1 37% 28.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 39%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 309GB free, PID 1048 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 5 5.1 5 5 5.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 37.5 Write 36.2 Mixed 25.4 SusWrite 5 33% 26 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 43%
WD My Passport 1.5TB 802 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 183GB free, PID 0748 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.9 5 5 5 5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 38.5 Write 38.4 Mixed 25.5 SusWrite 4.9 34% 26.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 44%
Samsung S2 Portable 500GB 2,689 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 120GB free, PID 1f05 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 5 5.1 5 5 5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	9.4% Terrible	Read 27 Write 17.3 Mixed 27.4 SusWrite 4.9 24% 19.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 9.4% Great: 21%
WD Elements 500GB 10,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 31GB free, PID 1023 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 5 5 5 4.9 4.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	9.93% Terrible	Read 35 Write 29.9 Mixed 22 SusWrite 4.9 29% 23 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.93% Great: 41%
WD Elements 500GB 10,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 30GB free, PID 1042 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5 5 5 5 5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 37.5 Write 37.2 Mixed 22.9 SusWrite 4.9 32% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMR5030EF68F9W1600 2x4GB 2,242 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 17.8 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 17.1 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 69.9 57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-7797 Builds (Compare 427 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Medion MS-7797

CPU
Core i5-3350PIntel $60Bench 65%, 21,413 samples	157x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	136x
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	148x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	25x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	21x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x

RAM
M2X4G64CB8HG5N-DG 2x4GBNanyaBench 54%, 1,719 samples	64x
M2X2G64CB88G7N-DG 2x2GBNanyaBench 48%, 472 samples	33x
M378B5773EB0-CK0 2x2GBSamsungBench 52%, 217 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 40% - Below average

Total price: $252

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16