Asus G53SW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemAsus G53SW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G53SW
Memory8.4 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '18 at 03:42
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
44.2% Average
1-Core 69.4
2-Core 134
48% 102 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 342
37% 288 Pts
64-Core 347
23% 347 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 48%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$35
242GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0002SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 70 64 70 69 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 76.5
Write 81.7
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 67.6
51% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 58%
TOSHIBA MK2555GSX 250GB
13GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 29
Write 23.8
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 13.9
28% 22 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 19%
SAMSUNG HM250HI 250GB
10GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 29
Write 20.7
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 14.1
29% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 21%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
253GB free, PID 2312
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 95 94 94 96 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 104
Write 38.2
Mixed 46
SusWrite 91.6
88% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
114% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 42%
SAMSUNG SP1644N 160GB
99GB free, PID 6830
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.5% Very poor
Read 24.2
Write 23.5
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 13.7
27% 20.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 HMT325S6EFR8A-PB 10GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.1% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 8.9
26% 9.17 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 42%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical G53SW Builds (Compare 142 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

System: Asus G53SW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $284
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $356AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $645SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback