Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics97.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus CROSSBLADE RANGER  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '18 at 19:49
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$889
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 77.3
1-Core 74.1
2-Core 133
58% 94.7 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 223
30% 222 Pts
64-Core 213
13% 213 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 135
Parallax 113
102% 125 fps
MRender 98
Gravity 123
Splatting 105
89% 109 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$67
391GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 374 393 411 410 412 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 444
Mixed 369
SusWrite 387
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 37.3
147% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 244
186% 252 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 117%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
16GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 487
Write 441
Mixed 357
95% 428 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 81
4K Mixed 46.4
164% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 145
137% 214 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
49GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 151 149 150 149 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 443
Mixed 365
SusWrite 177
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 51.7
176% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 251
189% 253 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 115%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115
106GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 236 245 255 256 256 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 316
Write 267
Mixed 258
SusWrite 241
61% 270 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 41
142% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 220
165% 220 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 176 177 177 176 178 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 132
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 174
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 114%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
782GB free
Firmware: CC53
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 113 114 115 115 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 111
Write 84
Mixed 68
SusWrite 112
69% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.7% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 17.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 12.4
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSBLADE RANGER Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CROSSBLADE RANGER - $897

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,119
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback