Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3000 1,043 User benchmarks, average bench 34% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	42.2% Average	Memory 76.7 1-Core 24.7 2-Core 42.4 36% 47.9 Pts	4-Core 48.6 8-Core 49.4 7% 49 Pts	64-Core 50.3 3% 50.3 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Legend(17AA 213A) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2869 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.36% Terrible	Lighting 0.43 Reflection 0.35 Parallax 0.41 0% 0.4 fps	MRender 0.43 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.57 0% 0.43 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.36% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: B1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 182 180 187 183 189 MB/s Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	56.4% Above average	Read 250 Write 206 Mixed 198 SusWrite 184 47% 210 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 45.6 4K Mixed 26.8 95% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 26.4 48% 96.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 56.4% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM 15h Reserved Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.1 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 4.1 13% 4.4 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.73 GB/s	Latency 86.8 46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16