Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	58.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	95.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	ECT One Computer Core i5-4670K, 4x (all builds)
Motherboard	Micro-Star B360-A PRO (MS-7B22)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181009
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 16 '18 at 01:23
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	59%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173 264,837 User benchmarks, average bench 91% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	77% Very good	Memory 76.1 1-Core 126 2-Core 232 80% 145 Pts	4-Core 432 8-Core 537 62% 484 Pts	64-Core 543 34% 543 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Nvidia(10DE 1F02) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.81 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	58.9% Above average	Lighting 70.7 Reflection 71.7 Parallax 77.6 58% 73.3 fps	MRender 102 Gravity 71.2 Splatting 59.3 61% 77.6 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 309 309 309 308 309 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	Read 424 Write 400 Mixed 404 SusWrite 309 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 32.4 4K Write 68.2 4K Mixed 43.1 140% 47.9 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 325 DQ Mixed 244 212% 315 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 128%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB 44,506 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 335GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 160 159 160 161 162 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	94% Outstanding	Read 167 Write 162 Mixed 86.5 SusWrite 161 105% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 94% Great: 104%
WD Elements 25A2 750GB 1,458 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 480GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 106 106 106 106 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	44.8% Average	Read 106 Write 104 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 106 126% 94.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FE 2x8GB 1,789 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	63.3% Good	MC Read 24.1 MC Write 24.2 MC Mixed 20.9 66% 23.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 20.5 SC Mixed 16.8 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 88 45% 88 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 52%

Yacht

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 44%

Speed boat

GPU
GeForce GTX 1060 6GBNvidiaBench 56%, 56,417 samples	8x
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	3x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	3x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	5x
AS350 256GBApacerBench 70%, 5,875 samples	5x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	4x

RAM
CT8G4DFS824A.M8FD 2x8GBCrucialBench 76%, 1,610 samples	3x
CT8G4DFS824A.M8FE 2x8GBCrucialBench 78%, 2,402 samples	3x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	3x

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $137

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16