Asrock H81M-HDS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H81M-HDS  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140702
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateDec 15 '18 at 22:30
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 67%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
35.5% Below average
Memory 59.1
1-Core 26.6
2-Core 32.3
29% 39.3 Pts
4-Core 67.1
8-Core 114
11% 90.8 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.3% Poor
Lighting 28.7
Reflection 22.4
Parallax 33.9
23% 28.3 fps
MRender 36.4
Gravity 36.3
Splatting 34.1
29% 35.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 169 146 141 141 136 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.5% Average
Read 204
Write 194
Mixed 188
SusWrite 149
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 29.1
4K Mixed 20.3
67% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 155
113% 146 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 115%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
34GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 81 80 79 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 111
Write 106
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 80.3
66% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 109%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 1TB
931GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 111
Write 91
Mixed 43.7
97% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
44% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
26.3% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 8.5
27% 9.47 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 6.2
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-HDS Builds (Compare 1,129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-HDS - $147

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback