PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | MSI MS-7968 |
Motherboard | MSI Z170A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM EDITION (all builds) |
Memory | 11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20160121 |
Uptime | 0.9 Days |
Run Date | Dec 15 '18 at 13:30 |
Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 41% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
81.8%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 2977) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50.1%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 38 36 34 36 32 MB/s
|
62.9%
Good
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
572GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 152 152 152 158 157 MB/s
|
87.7%
Excellent
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra 124GB
116GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 16 16 15 11 MB/s
|
10.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$201
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
39%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 352x |
Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 47x |
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 42x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 98x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 57x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 41x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 40% - Average | Total price: $1,380 |