Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics42.1% is a reasonable 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88M Extreme4+  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140117
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 15 '18 at 08:44
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
38% Below average
1-Core 43.1
2-Core 117
36% 80.2 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 247
33% 245 Pts
64-Core 237
16% 237 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
42.1% Average
Lighting 138
Reflection 112
Parallax 141
43% 130 fps
MRender 82.8
Gravity 121
Splatting 83.1
41% 95.5 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 45%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$40
458GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 69 80 81 82 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 146
Write 104
Mixed 109
SusWrite 78.5
81% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
211% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 108%
Seagate M3 Portable 1TB
315GB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 78 92 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 58.2
Write 88.8
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 87.3
52% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.3
125% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 69%
Seagate M3 Portable 1TB
113GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 82 102 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 87.8
Write 100
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 99.6
61% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.3
119% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 69%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
208GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 13 12 12 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 29.2
Write 27.8
SusWrite 13
28% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 44%
PHD 2.0 Silicon-Power 1TB
123GB free, PID 1d40
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 11 13 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
9.24% Terrible
Read 29.3
Write 27.2
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 12.5
31% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.24%
Great: 19%
WD Elements 10B8 500GB
59GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 11 13 13 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 26.5
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 12.4
30% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
38.2% Below average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 15.4
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 10.3
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 83%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical FM2A88M Extreme4+ Builds (Compare 725 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+ - $93

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $302
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198AMD RX 580 $172Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-9600K $219AMD RX 5700 XT $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback