Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	67% Good	Memory 77.5 1-Core 105 2-Core 217 74% 133 Pts	4-Core 329 8-Core 320 44% 324 Pts	64-Core 345 21% 345 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: MX4OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 110 119 113 115 112 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Read 122 Write 121 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 112 68% 94.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 108%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$33 24,309 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 213GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 80 78 76 81 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	48.6% Average	Read 93 Write 88.2 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 76.1 58% 78.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$379 7,634 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2800 MHz clocked @ 1400 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	82.4% Excellent	MC Read 31.2 MC Write 29.5 MC Mixed 29.3 86% 30 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 30.2 SC Mixed 21.8 68% 23.8 GB/s	Latency 85.3 47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 102%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	10x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	9x
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples	7x

RAM
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	5x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	3x
BLS8G4D30BESBK.8FD 2x8GBCrucialBench 86%, 12,876 samples	3x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $300

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16