HP Z240 SFF Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP Z240 SFF Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 802E
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160704
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 14 '18 at 19:32
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 97%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v5
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 167
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 549
54% 443 Pts
64-Core 589
36% 589 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 315
HP(103C 102F) 1GB
CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 437 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 372.95
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
1.47% Terrible
Lighting 1.73
Reflection 2
Parallax 0.78
1% 1.5 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 1.83
2% 1.95 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.47%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 750GB-$310
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 363 231 88 102 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 381
Write 396
Mixed 325
SusWrite 202
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 41
4K Mixed 20.2
78% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 167
143% 210 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 125%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
965GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 17 15 20 15 9.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
43% Average
Read 134
Write 151
Mixed 66
SusWrite 16.3
68% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 43%
Great: 96%
Generic External 2TB
120GB free, PID 1340
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 38 38 40 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 22.7
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 38.1
42% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
65% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 23%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
175GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 50 48 48 44 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 11.5
Write 21
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 50.8
38% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.1
70% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 59%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
163GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 33 45 30 31 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 63.8
Write 64.5
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 31.5
58% 45.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.1
32% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 59%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB
196GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 30 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 16.8
Write 16.5
Mixed 11.8
SusWrite 32.6
27% 19.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
38% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
72.1% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 23.2
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 20.6
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z240 SFF Workstation Builds (Compare 917 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z240 SFF Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $180
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback