Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '18 at 19:14
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 64.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 206
69% 125 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 541
55% 448 Pts
64-Core 826
51% 826 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.12.1
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55.2% Above average
Lighting 70.1
Reflection 68.3
Parallax 86.6
57% 75 fps
MRender 69.7
Gravity 64.9
Splatting 57.1
52% 63.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LE200 SSD 120GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM10.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 72 41 70 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 404
Write 62.5
Mixed 115
SusWrite 65.6
35% 162 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 19.9
89% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 8.6
54% 127 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55%
Great: 82%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
928GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 188 184 180 184 187 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 92.5
Write 185
Mixed 30
SusWrite 185
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 107%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
4GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.3 3.1 3.8 4 4.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.44% Terrible
Read 22
Write 17.7
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 3.6
16% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.44%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5713-001.A00G 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
55.2% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 20.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,033 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $322
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback