Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 90% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 84% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	93.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	53.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 14 '18 at 14:11
Run Duration	199 Seconds
Run User	ARE-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285 15,468 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	79.3% Very good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 91.6 2-Core 175 70% 119 Pts	4-Core 371 8-Core 620 60% 496 Pts	64-Core 1,037 64% 1,037 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 94%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$286 8,692 User benchmarks, average bench 121% Nvidia(10DE 119A) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	108% Outstanding	Lighting 135 Reflection 194 Parallax 204 110% 178 fps	MRender 124 Gravity 178 Splatting 112 111% 138 fps
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 132%
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615 15,621 User benchmarks, average bench 75% EVGA(3842 2992) CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Lighting 109 Reflection 123 Parallax 110 89% 114 fps	MRender 95.6 Gravity 102 Splatting 96.5 80% 98.1 fps
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 545GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 349 329 293 287 318 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	93.9% Outstanding	Read 443 Write 438 Mixed 368 SusWrite 320 88% 392 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 70 4K Mixed 42.9 132% 46.3 MB/s	DQ Read 350 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 331 251% 337 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 93.9% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 560GB free Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 351 344 318 331 352 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 456 Write 410 Mixed 409 SusWrite 340 91% 404 MB/s	4K Read 37.5 4K Write 94.9 4K Mixed 51.6 173% 61.3 MB/s	DQ Read 371 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 60 124% 252 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 183 182 185 183 185 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 196 Write 129 Mixed 81.8 SusWrite 183 108% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 186 185 186 187 187 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 167 Write 124 Mixed 78 SusWrite 185 101% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 114%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 209GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 55 56 56 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 75.3 Write 61.7 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 55.2 42% 57.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 75% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 67%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 57GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 38 38 37 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	Read 39.8 Write 38 Mixed 22.3 SusWrite 37.5 25% 34.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.4 80% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 4x16GB-$530 133 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	114% Outstanding	MC Read 49.7 MC Write 42.6 MC Mixed 42.4 128% 44.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 21.1 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 147%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-PRO/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO/USB 3.1 - $394

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	227x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	103x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	52x

GPU
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	40x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	39x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	37x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	11x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	15x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	13x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $1,193

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16