Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF H370-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180620
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 14 '18 at 13:31
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 139
2-Core 273
93% 168 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 864
86% 699 Pts
64-Core 1,135
70% 1,135 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8611) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
32.4% Below average
Lighting 40.6
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 38
33% 36.6 fps
MRender 38.8
Gravity 40.2
Splatting 36.3
31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 595 282 281 279 278 276 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1,069
Write 922
Mixed 433
SusWrite 332
153% 689 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 48.4
190% 70.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1062
DQ Write 1,055
DQ Mixed 753
650% 957 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 168%
Great: 236%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
41GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 75 76 76 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 85.4
Write 81.6
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 76.1
55% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 84%
WD WD20EACS-11BHUB0 2TB
3GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 53 50 53 53 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 47.6
Write 49.9
Mixed 20
SusWrite 51.5
31% 42.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
67% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 66%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
931GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 178 176 180 180 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 165
Mixed 75.6
SusWrite 178
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
79.3% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 22.4
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 25.6
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF H370-PRO GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 434 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $402
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback