| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 95% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus M4A89GTD-PRO (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20101223 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 14 '18 at 12:26 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | CZE-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.4%
Good
|
51% 78.5 Pts
|
29% 234 Pts
|
17% 281 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
MSI(1462 2381) 1GB
CLim: 811 MHz, MLim: 975 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.1
|
15.1%
Very poor
|
14% 17.7 fps
|
17% 20.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 219 185 174 163 151 MB/s
|
95%
Outstanding
|
84% 374 MB/s
|
165% 60.4 MB/s
|
190% 254 MB/s
|
|
|
59.1%
Above average
|
76% 103 MB/s
|
181% 1.33 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5471-001.A00LF 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.5%
Below average
|
32% 11.1 GB/s
|
19% 6.8 GB/s
|
56% 70.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M4A89GTD-PRO Builds (Compare 61 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples | 7x |
| Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 7x |
| Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 7x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 4x |
| HD 6870AMDBench 15%, 25,443 samples | 3x |
| Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $269 |