Schenkertechnologiesgmbh XMG NEO 15 - XNE15M18

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	48.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Schenkertechnologiesgmbh XMG NEO 15 - XNE15M18 (all builds)
Motherboard	SchenkerTechnologiesGmbH GK5CN6Z
Memory	13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180613
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 14 '18 at 11:11
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	5%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Memory 93.8 1-Core 123 2-Core 220 84% 146 Pts	4-Core 360 8-Core 486 54% 423 Pts	64-Core 605 37% 605 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Device(1D05 1043) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1735 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.2% Average	Lighting 56.8 Reflection 67.5 Parallax 51.4 46% 58.5 fps	MRender 64.8 Gravity 57.8 Splatting 66.1 52% 62.9 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 580GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1270 1789 1540 820 1049 1023 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	203% Outstanding	Read 558 Write 876 Mixed 591 SusWrite 1,248 186% 818 MB/s	4K Read 52.6 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 67.1 221% 74.5 MB/s	DQ Read 862 DQ Write 744 DQ Mixed 803 602% 803 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 203% Great: 372%
General USB Flash Disk 64GB 2,253 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 32GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 22 17 20 18 13 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Read 24.4 Write 14.7 Mixed 17.2 SusWrite 15 23% 17.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.3 84% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	81.5% Excellent	MC Read 31.5 MC Write 31.1 MC Mixed 22.3 81% 28.3 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 33.1 SC Mixed 27.6 76% 26.7 GB/s	Latency 60.2 66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical XMG NEO 15 - XNE15M18 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 40%

Speed boat

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

System: Schenkertechnologiesgmbh XMG NEO 15 - XNE15M18

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	18x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	7x

SSD
PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G-1032 512GBWDCBench 221%, 6,012 samples	9x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	2x
CT1000P3SSD8 1TBBench 268%, 44,174 samples	2x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	6x
CM4X8GF2666C18S2 2x8GBCorsairBench 77%, 2,035 samples	3x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 75%, 4,823 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16