Foxconn P55A Series

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Foxconn P55A Series (all builds)
Motherboard	FOXCONN P55A Series
Memory	2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1400 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100630
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 14 '18 at 09:11
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 540-$60 24,563 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	51.3% Above average	Memory 70.2 1-Core 76.1 2-Core 149 58% 98.5 Pts	4-Core 189 8-Core 192 26% 191 Pts	64-Core 192 12% 192 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203 31,648 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Gigabyte(1458 34FA) 768MB CLim: 715 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 768MB, Driver: 388.13 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	4.69% Terrible	Lighting 0.03 Reflection 0.08 Parallax 0.06 0% 0.06 fps	MRender 20.2 Gravity 15.6 Splatting 15.3 14% 17 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 4.69% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
F200 120GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 14GB free Firmware: S9FM02.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 38 32 31 28 27 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	17.1% Very poor	Read 99.5 Write 69.1 Mixed 127 SusWrite 34.9 18% 82.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 32.6 4K Mixed 8.3 28% 13.7 MB/s	DQ Read 81.5 DQ Write 13.4 DQ Mixed 2.4 13% 32.4 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 54%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 83 87 80 79 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	50.2% Above average	Read 91.2 Write 92.7 Mixed 60.7 SusWrite 83.6 60% 82 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 62%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 19GB free Firmware: 01.03A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 57 57 58 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	35% Below average	Read 63.7 Write 64.2 Mixed 48.7 SusWrite 57.8 43% 58.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 60%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 24GB free Firmware: 12.01C02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 48 47 48 48 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	27.2% Poor	Read 46.5 Write 46.5 Mixed 38.6 SusWrite 47.6 33% 44.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 69%
General USB Flash Disk 8GB 131 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 5GB free, PID 8005 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 9.4 9.5 9.5 9.6 9.1 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	6.04% Terrible	Read 22.6 Write 9 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 9.3 13% 11.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 6.04% Great: 6%
Xiaomi WiFi Flash Disk 8GB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 6GB free, PID 8003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 10 9.1 9.6 7.1 8.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	8.3% Terrible	Read 18.6 Write 9.7 Mixed 12 SusWrite 8.9 15% 12.3 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.3 88% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.3% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 0, 0 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	30.2% Below average	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 13 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 8 22% 7.57 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P55A Series Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Foxconn P55A Series

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	10x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	5x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	5x
GTX 275Nvidia $250Bench 9%, 3,083 samples	5x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	3x

SSD
SSD 120GBAddlinkBench 55%, 79 samples	5x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	3x
SSD 128GBBench 64%, 3,975 samples	3x

RAM
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	9x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	4x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $184

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16