Lenovo 2325ZFY

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 2325ZFY  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2325ZFY
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '18 at 08:03
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 77.7
1-Core 81.6
2-Core 131
59% 96.7 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 210
25% 191 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21FA) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.93% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 5.81
Parallax 3.03
4% 4.41 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.39
5% 5.24 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.93%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 43 12 36 45 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 318
Write 74
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 38.1
26% 123 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 24.9
4K Mixed 13.7
63% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 64.8
DQ Mixed 48.1
51% 85.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 M471B5173EB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
49.1% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16.5
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 13.6
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 84.9
47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback