Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	43.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6100-$68 44,863 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	61.5% Good	Memory 82.4 1-Core 65.7 2-Core 130 57% 92.7 Pts	4-Core 225 8-Core 297 33% 261 Pts	64-Core 301 19% 301 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3417) CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.11.1 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.7% Average	Lighting 47.5 Reflection 70.8 Parallax 90.1 39% 69.5 fps	MRender 70 Gravity 70.4 Splatting 58 53% 66.1 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB 14,293 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 54 56 56 54 56 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	38.3% Below average	Read 152 Write 56.5 Mixed 80.8 SusWrite 55.5 19% 86.2 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 45 4K Mixed 22.7 83% 29.2 MB/s	DQ Read 81.4 DQ Write 59.4 DQ Mixed 73.4 54% 71.4 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 51%
Samsung HD642JJ 640GB-$70 13,060 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 377GB free Firmware: 1AA01117 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 110 110 109 110 110 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Read 109 Write 63.3 Mixed 61.3 SusWrite 110 63% 86 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 63%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 25GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 4.2 4.1 3.9 4.2 3.9 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 30.5 Write 4 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 3.9 10% 10.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 2.8 175% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB 3,471 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.2% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 15.7 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 11.9 28% 9.7 GB/s	Latency 76.3 52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	5x
HD 7770AMDBench 12%, 38,053 samples	4x

SSD
SSDPR-CX400-512-G2 512GBBench 78%, 3,021 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	3x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	2x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	2x

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $207

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16