Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5 6,024 User benchmarks, average bench 66% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Memory 84.3 1-Core 114 2-Core 196 76% 132 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 583 56% 461 Pts	64-Core 584 36% 584 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 76%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD P530 (Server Skylake) 5,499 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 222E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4821 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	6.46% Terrible	Lighting 6.97 Reflection 9.54 Parallax 6.81 6% 7.77 fps	MRender 7.24 Gravity 5.97 Splatting 14.2 8% 9.13 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.46% Great: 6%
Nvidia Quadro M2000M 5,864 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Legend(17AA 222E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1137 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 389.8 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Lighting 21.8 Reflection 15.3 Parallax 19.7 18% 18.9 fps	MRender 21.5 Gravity 23.1 Splatting 16.5 16% 20.3 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8TN8U256G1001 256GB 1,739 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: X413 SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 198 195 199 195 193 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	78% Very good	Read 435 Write 290 Mixed 219 SusWrite 199 64% 286 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 20.6 124% 51.8 MB/s	DQ Read 326 DQ Write 223 DQ Mixed 218 178% 256 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 78% Great: 90%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 250GB 159 User benchmarks, average bench 210% 207GB free, PID 61f5 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 300 301 297 285 265 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	336% Outstanding	Read 301 Write 317 Mixed 266 SusWrite 296 403% 295 MB/s	4K Read 33.1 4K Write 71.7 4K Mixed 42 3,990% 48.9 MB/s	DQ Read 39.7 DQ Write 80.9 DQ Mixed 49.5 4,583% 56.7 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 336% Great: 377%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF 1x16GB 4,427 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	40.6% Average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 11.7 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 14.1 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

CPU
Xeon E3-1505M v5IntelBench 66%, 6,024 samples	50x

GPU
Quadro M2000MNvidiaBench 16%, 5,864 samples	28x
HD P530 (Server Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 5,499 samples	21x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	1x

SSD
SD8TN8U256G1001 256GBSandiskBench 72%, 1,739 samples	5x
MZNLN256HCHP-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 2,407 samples	5x
TM8FP8002T 2TBT-forceBench 205%, 870 samples	3x

RAM
M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GBSamsungBench 38%, 8,819 samples	8x
16ATF2G64HZ-2G1A1 1x16GBMicronBench 38%, 430 samples	4x
HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF 1x16GBHynixBench 38%, 4,427 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16