| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock A320M-DGS (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1804 x 1014 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20181004 |
| Uptime | 0.8 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 13 '18 at 15:32 |
| Run Duration | 137 Seconds |
| Run User | BGR-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
76.9%
Very good
|
76% 137 Pts
|
59% 442 Pts
|
27% 433 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1F02) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
103%
Outstanding
|
103% 129 fps
|
106% 134 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
293GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 134 124 122 122 125 MB/s
|
76.3%
Very good
|
83% 114 MB/s
|
116% 1 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Cruzer Force 16GB
14GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 9 8.7 9 9.6 8.6 MB/s
|
13.2%
Very poor
|
14% 10.9 MB/s
|
226% 3.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
94.2%
Outstanding
|
98% 34.3 GB/s
|
80% 28 GB/s
|
47% 85.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-DGS Builds (Compare 450 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DGS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples | 67x |
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 64x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 49x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 80x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 34x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 20x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $187 |