Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2620M 16,111 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Memory 82.2 1-Core 85.3 2-Core 158 65% 108 Pts	4-Core 215 8-Core 215 29% 215 Pts	64-Core 211 13% 211 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 1000M 6,108 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 1631) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.62 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.55% Terrible	Lighting 4.33 Reflection 5.04 Parallax 3.53 4% 4.3 fps	MRender 6.14 Gravity 4.5 Splatting 3.09 4% 4.58 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.55% Great: 3%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0105A Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 3,568 Write 37.1 Mixed 74.7 255% 1,227 MB/s	4K Read 427 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 5 654% 145 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 103GB free Firmware: SBFK71E0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 3,626 Write 37.5 Mixed 75.5 259% 1,246 MB/s	4K Read 450 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 5 689% 152 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	47.2% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 15.2 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 14.7 41% 14.5 GB/s	Latency 76.6 52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro 1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 6,108 samples	287x
Quadro 2000MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,227 samples	126x
FirePro M5950 AMDBench 5%, 1,394 samples	47x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $258

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16