Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics59.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 12 '18 at 22:55
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 83
1-Core 48.6
2-Core 99.6
50% 77.1 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 196
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 190
12% 190 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Lighting 73.8
Reflection 73.8
Parallax 65.1
60% 70.9 fps
MRender 70.1
Gravity 71.7
Splatting 71.7
58% 71.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 137 151 147 148 152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 301
Write 211
Mixed 238
SusWrite 147
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 36.2
127% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 175
132% 176 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 84%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
265GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 81 80 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 82.7
Write 76.8
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 80.1
52% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 54%
Linux File-CD Gadget 32GB
29GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
1.93% Terrible
Read 0.7
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 0.8
1% 0.72 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
36% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 1.93%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905403-083.A00LF 9905403-083.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.7% Poor
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 9.4
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 7.6
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback