MSI Z77A-G45 (MS-7752)

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	MSI MS-7752
Motherboard	MSI Z77A-G45 (MS-7752) (all builds)
Memory	26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121219
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '18 at 22:49
Run Duration	278 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 5.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	83.4% Excellent	Memory 92 1-Core 123 2-Core 241 86% 152 Pts	4-Core 403 8-Core 590 62% 496 Pts	64-Core 589 36% 589 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% MSI(1462 C300) CLim: 2202 MHz, MLim: 2249 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.82 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.8% Below average	Lighting 0.43 Reflection 0.54 Parallax 11.8 0% 4.26 fps	MRender 97.7 Gravity 125 Splatting 106 90% 110 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 509GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 918 507 509 500 505 505 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 298 147 100 101 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Read 472 Write 457 Mixed 386 SusWrite 188 84% 376 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 95 4K Mixed 40 148% 55.2 MB/s	DQ Read 33.9 DQ Write 89 DQ Mixed 368 193% 164 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 134%
Samsung 830 64GB 4,094 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 7GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 238 Write 134 Mixed 160 39% 177 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 36.5 4K Mixed 17.8 69% 24 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 42.6 DQ Mixed 40.5 48% 86.9 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 63%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 320GB-$59 5,970 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 113GB free Firmware: GM3OA52A SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 64 68 68 67 68 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 67.3 Write 66 Mixed 38.7 SusWrite 67 44% 59.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 46%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 218GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 51 52 51 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Read 41.5 Write 34.2 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 51.1 30% 40.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 54%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 265GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 128 129 130 131 131 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Read 170 Write 125 Mixed 85 SusWrite 130 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 108%
Generic- SD/MMC 127GB 43GB free, PID 0151 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 18 17 15 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	8.8% Terrible	Read 19 Write 16.5 Mixed 18.3 SusWrite 16.8 24% 17.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1.3 73% 1.4 MB/s

Seagate Expansion 500GB 1,703 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 15GB free, PID 2320 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 67 67 67 67 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	28.4% Poor	Read 65 Write 55.7 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 66.6 75% 56 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB 199 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	57.8% Above average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 20.3 MC Mixed 18.2 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 19.6 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 64 62% 64 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 100%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77A-G45 (MS-7752) Builds (Compare 1,230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI Z77A-G45 (MS-7752)

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	526x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	224x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	165x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	102x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	97x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	62x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	42x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	40x
840 120GBSamsung $109Bench 61%, 51,792 samples	38x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	29x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	28x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $332

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16