Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive255% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory58.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '18 at 22:48
Run Duration344 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 88%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 89
1-Core 123
2-Core 241
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 950
85% 716 Pts
64-Core 950
59% 950 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.94
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 183
Reflection 171
Parallax 180
149% 178 fps
Splatting 109
112% 109 fps
Poor: 109% Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1209 308 310 310 311 310 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 2,364
Write 1,469
Mixed 1,118
SusWrite 460
299% 1,353 MB/s
4K Read 62.3
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 79.7
270% 93.8 MB/s
DQ Read 979
DQ Write 1,224
DQ Mixed 1,013
789% 1,072 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 255%
Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
813GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 479 484 488 489 489 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 488
Mixed 456
SusWrite 484
110% 486 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 64.1
222% 81.3 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 352
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 135%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
928GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 479 485 489 489 489 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 486
Mixed 461
SusWrite 484
110% 486 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 62.9
219% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 354
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 134%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
819GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 142
Write 14
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 13.5
33% 46.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.4
105% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 114%
Asmedia ASMT1153e 1TB
406GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 84 86 86 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
48% Average
Read 81.8
Write 79
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 85
54% 74 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 48%
Great: 101%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
986GB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 119 119 117 112 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 81.3
Write 99
Mixed 73
SusWrite 117
68% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.6
169% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
77.9% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 25.1
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 30.7
SC Mixed 24.1
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING Builds (Compare 15,581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING - $369

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $1,266
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback