Lenovo 4354C9U

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics8.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 6 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 4354C9U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140109
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateDec 12 '18 at 19:07
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2-$103
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
27.3% Poor
1-Core 41.5
2-Core 78.1
28% 59.8 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 304
28% 226 Pts
64-Core 510
34% 510 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000
Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.78
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
8.9% Terrible
Lighting 27.1
Reflection 21.8
Parallax 34.2
7% 27.7 fps
MRender 25.4
Gravity 32.3
Splatting 27.2
9% 28.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.9%
Great: 9%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC62
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 104
Write 94
Mixed 59
64% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.4
276% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 111%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMT41GU7MFR8C 2x8GB
2 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
49.1% Average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 18.2
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.3
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 56%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 4354C9U Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Lenovo 4354C9U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $132
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $43
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $643SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback