Gigabyte GA-H110M-A

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	54.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H110M-A
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-A (all builds)
Memory	6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180412
Uptime	6.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '18 at 19:06
Run Duration	294 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$67 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Memory 69.2 1-Core 62.8 2-Core 115 50% 82.3 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 163 23% 167 Pts	64-Core 127 8% 127 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AB) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.46 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	54.6% Above average	Lighting 66.3 Reflection 73.7 Parallax 70.5 54% 70.2 fps	MRender 68.5 Gravity 66.9 Splatting 68.9 56% 68.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
AMD Radeon R3 240GB 4,257 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: O1015A SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 88 135 55 83 57 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35% Below average	Read 263 Write 196 Mixed 105 SusWrite 80.9 36% 161 MB/s	4K Read 9.3 4K Write 17.5 4K Mixed 5.9 31% 10.9 MB/s	DQ Read 263 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 67.6 96% 180 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 90%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 60 104 95 119 104 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 150 Write 102 Mixed 70 SusWrite 88.1 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GB-$41 16,658 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	39.4% Below average	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 14.7 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 10.9 SC Mixed 7.2 24% 8.3 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-A-CF Builds (Compare 1,636 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-A - $60

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	431x
Core i3-6100Intel $76Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	196x
Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	156x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	150x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	145x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	128x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	57x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	57x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	43x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	59x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	54x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	36x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 108% - Outstanding

Total price: $312

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16