Asus H61M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	31.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H61M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130124
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '18 at 19:01
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	84%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60 21,413 User benchmarks, average bench 65% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	47.2% Average	Memory 76.3 1-Core 49 2-Core 137 52% 87.3 Pts	4-Core 99.6 8-Core 299 22% 199 Pts	64-Core 310 19% 310 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 8461) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	5.32% Terrible	Lighting 6.67 Reflection 6.81 Parallax 8 5% 7.16 fps	MRender 4.62 Gravity 7.23 Splatting 6.61 5% 6.15 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.32% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 64 46 104 89 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	31.2% Below average	Read 308 Write 241 Mixed 212 SusWrite 103 48% 216 MB/s	4K Read 13.3 4K Write 17.3 4K Mixed 4.8 36% 11.8 MB/s	DQ Read 66 DQ Write 47.5 DQ Mixed 38.7 34% 50.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 55%
Crucial M550 128GB-$40 2,673 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 14GB free Firmware: MU01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 320 Write 331 Mixed 253 67% 301 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 50.8 4K Mixed 30 99% 34.3 MB/s	DQ Read 243 DQ Write 210 DQ Mixed 155 136% 203 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 104%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB 47,588 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 21GB free Firmware: 2BA30001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 54 55 54 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	Read 52.8 Write 45 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 54.5 36% 48.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 1x8GB 1,718 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1400 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 4.8 15% 5.3 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 5.3 13% 4.67 GB/s	Latency 87.7 46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-PLUS Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-PLUS

CPU
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples	5x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	4x
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	2x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	5x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	2x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	2x

SSD
BX500 120GBCrucial $15Bench 55%, 37,154 samples	2x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	2x
PM851 2.5 7mm 128GBSamsungBench 58%, 3,901 samples	1x

RAM
SUPERTALENT02 2x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 1,911 samples	3x
M378B1G73EB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 3,888 samples	2x
99U5402-031.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 52%, 274 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 17% - Very poor

Total price: $15

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16