Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	62% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180907
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '18 at 15:45
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Memory 86.1 1-Core 124 2-Core 247 85% 152 Pts	4-Core 488 8-Core 952 85% 720 Pts	64-Core 1,333 82% 1,333 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3283) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.22 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	62% Good	Lighting 77.1 Reflection 77.9 Parallax 67.8 63% 74.2 fps	MRender 73.4 Gravity 72.9 Splatting 74.8 60% 73.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 190GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1325 309 303 303 304 304 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	238% Outstanding	Read 2,488 Write 1,460 Mixed 1,037 SusWrite 475 301% 1,365 MB/s	4K Read 60.8 4K Write 148 4K Mixed 80.7 274% 96.6 MB/s	DQ Read 543 DQ Write 528 DQ Mixed 545 407% 539 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 238% Great: 280%
Toshiba MK5055GSX 500GB-$33 4,927 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 425GB free Firmware: FG001M SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 58 58 49 57 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	Read 47 Write 57.5 Mixed 26.3 SusWrite 56.1 34% 46.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.4 77% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 42%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 237GB free Firmware: 12.01B02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 60 60 60 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Read 59.3 Write 59.5 Mixed 47.7 SusWrite 60.1 42% 56.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 60%
Toshiba MK6476GSXN 640GB 655 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 539GB free Firmware: GB001M SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 8.2 8.2 8.1 8 8.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	20.2% Poor	Read 62.2 Write 7.5 Mixed 10 SusWrite 8.1 16% 21.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.1 37% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 49%
Kingston DataTraveler R3.0 G2 USB 3.0 32GB-$30 1,204 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 17GB free, PID 16a2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 47 49 49 48 46 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Read 144 Write 43.8 Mixed 26.8 SusWrite 48 71% 65.7 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1 122% 6.6 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB-$560 34,441 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	103% Outstanding	MC Read 39.7 MC Write 37.5 MC Mixed 35.1 107% 37.4 GB/s	SC Read 27.3 SC Write 37.1 SC Mixed 29 89% 31.1 GB/s	Latency 71.1 56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,850 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,431x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	306x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	280x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	233x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	229x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	202x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	189x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	188x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	177x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	201x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	142x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $127Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	134x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,013

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X470-F GAMING - $190

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)