Performance Results


Gaming 144% UFO	Desktop 100% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 134% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II (all builds)
Memory	26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180831
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '18 at 10:50
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	Memory 91.9 1-Core 146 2-Core 270 94% 169 Pts	4-Core 494 8-Core 854 82% 674 Pts	64-Core 1,085 67% 1,085 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 100%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Asus(1043 8675) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.1 Performing below potential (56^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	157% Outstanding	Lighting 217 Reflection 234 Parallax 243 177% 231 fps	MRender 262 Gravity 215 Splatting 140 161% 205 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 157% Great: 174%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7) 147,588 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8694) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6291 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	8.31% Terrible	Lighting 8.6 Reflection 12.2 Parallax 8.72 7% 9.84 fps	MRender 13.3 Gravity 7.77 Splatting 17.1 11% 12.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 8.31% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 332GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 485 481 354 294 293 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 488 Mixed 449 SusWrite 397 104% 461 MB/s	4K Read 41.3 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 56.4 190% 67.3 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 356 269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 461GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 485 481 484 408 291 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	124% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 485 Mixed 449 SusWrite 438 106% 471 MB/s	4K Read 41.9 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 57.6 195% 69.3 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 357 269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 722GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2299 2187 1151 1161 1160 1159 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	339% Outstanding	Read 2,536 Write 2,366 Mixed 1323 SusWrite 1,519 433% 1,936 MB/s	4K Read 62.9 4K Write 167 4K Mixed 90.3 300% 107 MB/s	DQ Read 1201 DQ Write 1,129 DQ Mixed 1,100 844% 1,143 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 339% Great: 372%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$80 110,884 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.5% Very good	MC Read 28.4 MC Write 28.5 MC Mixed 23.4 76% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 18.3 SC Write 30 SC Mixed 24.5 69% 24.3 GB/s	Latency 64.3 62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 114%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	27x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	23x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 87,241 samples	41x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	24x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $532

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16