| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161118 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 12 '18 at 01:03 |
| Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65.4%
Good
|
58% 94.3 Pts
|
40% 322 Pts
|
24% 383 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.12.1.1
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
53%
Above average
|
54% 72.4 fps
|
51% 63.4 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba MK2555GSX 250GB-$77
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FG001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 29 37 39 41 43 MB/s
|
21.4%
Poor
|
30% 40 MB/s
|
89% 0.6 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3
|
29.3%
Poor
|
27% 9.47 GB/s
|
23% 8 GB/s
|
56% 71.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,267 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 433x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 294x |
| FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples | 176x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 177x |
| Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples | 86x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 84x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $134 |