Dell Studio XPS 9100

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics75.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Studio XPS 9100  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 05DN3X
Memory18.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101021
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 12 '18 at 00:17
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 96%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 930-$199
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 92.8
1-Core 70.9
2-Core 138
63% 100 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 347
35% 285 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.9% Very good
Lighting 92.5
Reflection 106
Parallax 97.7
75% 98.8 fps
MRender 93.9
Gravity 90.8
Splatting 96.5
77% 93.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX Predator AHCI PCIe M.2 480GB-$300
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C4005T3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 619 610 763 777 812 881 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 801
Write 798
Mixed 526
SusWrite 744
161% 717 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 27.2
88% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 406
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 107
148% 274 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 121%
Great: 181%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
267GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 668 260 260 260 261 260 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
276GB free
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 223 232 235 234 231 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.4% Above average
Read 238
Write 234
Mixed 210
SusWrite 228
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 24.2
79% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 160
122% 164 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 155 156 137 155 153 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 64.2
Write 14.3
Mixed 66.2
SusWrite 150
55% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 113%
Samsung Flash Drive 32GB
30GB free, PID 1000, Samsung 32GB BAR (METAL) USB 3.0 Flash Drive (MUF-32BA/AM)
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 16 12 14 12 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 24.7
Mixed 14.3
SusWrite 15
27% 21.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.5
92% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 BLS4G3D1339DS1S00. CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 BLS4G3D1339DS1S00. BLS4G3D1339DS1S00. BLS4G3D1339DS1S00. 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.2% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 18
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 12.2
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 9100 Builds (Compare 420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Dell Studio XPS 9100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $429
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback