Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP ENVY 6 Notebbok PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1897
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140516
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 11 '18 at 23:55
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	94%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225 26,848 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	24.3% Poor	Memory 36.5 1-Core 29.5 2-Core 44.5 24% 36.8 Pts	4-Core 69.9 8-Core 80.9 10% 75.4 Pts	64-Core 70.5 4% 70.5 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? HP(103C 1897) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.88% Terrible	Lighting 3.23 Reflection 3.42 Parallax 2.28 3% 2.98 fps	MRender 3.24 Gravity 2.07 Splatting 6.17 3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.88% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD mSATA 128GB-$159 644 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: 000F SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 149 152 161 145 130 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 323 Write 153 Mixed 196 SusWrite 148 46% 205 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 21.7 4K Mixed 8.3 41% 14.2 MB/s	DQ Read 132 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 28.8 47% 90.2 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP536727-H41-ELD 2x4GB 874 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 15.3 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 7.5 22% 7.73 GB/s	Latency 219 18% 219 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16