| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Biostar H61MLV2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120717 |
| Uptime | 1.1 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 11 '18 at 23:05 |
| Run Duration | 110 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
|
64.8%
Good
|
66% 110 Pts
|
34% 259 Pts
|
15% 248 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.9.3
|
50.2%
Above average
|
52% 70.9 fps
|
48% 59 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 142 118 146 155 158 MB/s
|
89.5%
Excellent
|
92% 127 MB/s
|
148% 1.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QUM3U-8G1600C11R 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
26.2%
Poor
|
23% 8.07 GB/s
|
23% 8.1 GB/s
|
56% 71.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61MLV2 Builds (Compare 266 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Biostar H61MLV2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 31x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 28x |
| Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples | 17x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 39x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 32x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 16x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $107 |