Gigabyte GA-H81M-D2V

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H81M-D2V (all builds)
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130823
Uptime	4.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 11 '18 at 21:21
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	43%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	59.4% Above average	Memory 77.1 1-Core 79.5 2-Core 156 62% 104 Pts	4-Core 240 8-Core 255 33% 248 Pts	64-Core 242 15% 242 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3282) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.22 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.6% Above average	Lighting 66.1 Reflection 63.4 Parallax 58.9 54% 62.8 fps	MRender 66.2 Gravity 64.2 Splatting 64.2 53% 64.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 101 92 94 107 110 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Read 404 Write 357 Mixed 330 SusWrite 129 68% 305 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 75.1 4K Mixed 40 133% 47.7 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 352 266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 604GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 173 170 159 178 178 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	93.8% Outstanding	Read 159 Write 136 Mixed 31 SusWrite 169 89% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.C16 1x8GB 12,839 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	25.8% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 7.7 24% 8.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7.7 20% 7.03 GB/s	Latency 86.2 46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H81M-D2V Builds (Compare 985 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-D2V - $84

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	108x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	102x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	86x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	68x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	67x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	63x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	59x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	35x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	24x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	26x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	23x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $306

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16