Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R (all builds)
Memory	7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120106
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 11 '18 at 20:11
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Memory 97.2 1-Core 74.2 2-Core 152 66% 108 Pts	4-Core 242 8-Core 383 38% 313 Pts	64-Core 384 24% 384 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410 30,815 User benchmarks, average bench 53% Gigabyte(1458 3628) 3GB CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.94 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	56% Above average	Lighting 69.1 Reflection 66.5 Parallax 88.5 56% 74.7 fps	MRender 78.7 Gravity 81.2 Splatting 50.1 55% 70 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2CV102M3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 51 44 34 35 42 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Read 248 Write 82.2 Mixed 49.3 SusWrite 44.6 23% 106 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 32.1 4K Mixed 11.2 58% 20.4 MB/s	DQ Read 75.8 DQ Write 69.2 DQ Mixed 15.2 27% 53.4 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 44%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB 10,663 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 181GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 111 110 109 111 112 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Read 116 Write 114 Mixed 81.5 SusWrite 110 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 72%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,598 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 10GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 13 3.7 4.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 23.8 Write 16.8 Mixed 15 SusWrite 9.2 20% 16.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 2.6 156% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x2GB 38,297 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 6 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	MC Read 22.3 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 22.4 60% 21 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 15.1 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 49.4 81% 49.4 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X58A-UD3R Builds (Compare 2,015 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R - $210

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	627x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	405x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	217x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	148x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	104x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	102x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	70x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	57x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	342x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	331x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	224x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $397

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16