Toshiba Qosmio X505

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemToshiba Qosmio X505  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Qosmio X505
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1680 x 945 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101210
Uptime5 Days
Run DateDec 11 '18 at 11:38
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 450
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
44.2% Average
Memory 62.6
1-Core 64.7
2-Core 112
48% 79.6 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 152
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 360M
Toshiba(1179 FF50) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
4.81% Terrible
Lighting 6.47
Reflection 6.73
Parallax 2.69
5% 5.29 fps
MRender 6.71
Gravity 4.43
Splatting 3.78
4% 4.98 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.81%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 505ABBF1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 86 80 77 79 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 166
Write 135
Mixed 142
SusWrite 82
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 14.5
54% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 98.5
83% 120 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 73%
Hitachi HTS725050A9A360 500GB
10GB free
Firmware: PC4OC71E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 52 52 52 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
29.6% Poor
Read 50.8
Write 47.2
Mixed 32
SusWrite 52.1
34% 45.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
145% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 58%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -SD 16GB
11GB free, PID 0326
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 18 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 28
Write 8.5
Mixed 15.5
SusWrite 15.6
20% 16.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
80% 2 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 26%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
99GB free, PID 0200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 26.7
Write 20.5
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 17.8
27% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 533 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
23% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 9.7
22% 7.87 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 5.8
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Qosmio X505 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Qosmio X505

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $218
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback