User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade
MotherboardRAZER RAZER
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140507
Uptime22 Days
Run DateDec 11 '18 at 10:11
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 173
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 431
44% 357 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Intel(8086 0416) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4264
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.97% Terrible
Lighting 3.87
Reflection 6.77
Parallax 6.81
3% 5.82 fps
MRender 9.95
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.91
6% 6.74 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.97%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 169 169 164 164 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 454
Write 435
Mixed 373
SusWrite 194
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 84.7
4K Mixed 47.7
156% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 358
270% 361 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 95%
Great: 122%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
56.7% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 16.4
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 19.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback