TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock Z97 Anniversary

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics61.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Anniversary  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160527
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 11 '18 at 05:54
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$52
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 94.9
1-Core 111
2-Core 220
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 418
56% 419 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑
This bench: 83.6%
 Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
MSI(1462 3160)
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.7% Good
Lighting 76.6
Reflection 79.8
Parallax 71
62% 75.8 fps
MRender 83.7
Gravity 72.2
Splatting 67.5
60% 74.5 fps
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 61.7%
 Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 55 55 55 54 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 502
Write 447
Mixed 402
SusWrite 91.8
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 34.9
118% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 239
172% 225 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 72.1%
 Great: 91%
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
33GB free
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 224 213 211 192 177 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 457
Mixed 338
SusWrite 235
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 49.9
186% 70.7 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 250
210% 306 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 107%
 Great: 101%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
22GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 46 48 47 48 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 77.8
Write 55.2
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 47.3
45% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑
This bench: 36.1%
 Great: 54%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
26GB free
Firmware: AX101U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 3.5 4.8 4.4 4.4 6.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 2.7
Mixed 3
SusWrite 4
7% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
33% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 10.1%
 Great: 57%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
104GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 171 175 178 177 176 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 78.8
Write 76
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 175
68% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 72.8%
 Great: 103%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
34GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 73.5
Mixed 32
50% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
64.3% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 20.5
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 20.3
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 57.3
70% 57.3 ns
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 64.3%
 Great: 64%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z97 Anniversary Builds (Compare 1,183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Anniversary - $120

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel  $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples326x
Core i5-4690KIntel  $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples243x
Core i7-4790Intel  $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples112x
GPU
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples140x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples96x
GTX 960Nvidia  $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples77x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples69x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples56x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples40x
RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples36x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples36x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples29x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $768
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback