PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 50.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 21.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 (all builds) |
Memory | 9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20140506 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Dec 11 '18 at 01:11 |
Run Duration | 118 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
64.9%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Palit(1569 13C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.24
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50.5%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
INTENSO 128GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM07.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 4.9 11 5 6.1 13 MB/s
|
21.6%
Poor
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
76GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 101 102 103 102 MB/s
|
58.2%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
45.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 49x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 30x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 22x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 17x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 12x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $253 |