Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180111
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 10 '18 at 20:06
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 90.5
1-Core 136
2-Core 270
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 875
84% 690 Pts
64-Core 1130
70% 1130 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Lighting 68.8
Reflection 70.6
Parallax 60.7
56% 66.7 fps
MRender 72.3
Gravity 66.9
Splatting 68
56% 69 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 998GB
717GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 852 877 594 479 481 486 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 979
Write 884
Mixed 602
SusWrite 628
173% 773 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 97.6
4K Mixed 37.2
139% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 577
DQ Mixed 348
288% 404 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 139%
Great: 732%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,755
Write 1,169
Mixed 687
265% 1,204 MB/s
4K Read 60.7
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 79.4
277% 99.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,099
DQ Write 956
DQ Mixed 933
725% 996 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$178
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 110 110 110 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 122
Write 127
Mixed 90.2
SusWrite 109
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 98%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB
2GB free, PID 0690
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 87.5
Write 94.5
Mixed 66.3
106% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
54% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 50%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB
553GB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 180 182 182 180 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 156
Write 133
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 181
184% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
68% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 22.7
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 26.1
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback