Fujitsu CELSIUS W280

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W280  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2912-A1
Memory9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '18 at 18:03
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 760-$100
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 76
2-Core 147
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 291
39% 290 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.3% Good
Lighting 74.9
Reflection 74.3
Parallax 65.1
61% 71.4 fps
MRender 71.8
Gravity 70.8
Splatting 72.9
59% 71.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 162 158 144 146 135 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.1% Good
Read 238
Write 232
Mixed 215
SusWrite 160
48% 211 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 50.9
4K Mixed 32.2
106% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 174
137% 189 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 118%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
98GB free
Firmware: 0003LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 70 69 71 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 70.7
Write 67.8
Mixed 40.6
SusWrite 70.1
46% 62.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 58%
WD Elements 1078 2TB
149GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 18.3
Write 18.9
Mixed 17.6
SusWrite 18.6
25% 18.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.4
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HP698650-154-KEB 80CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 0198 HP698650-154-KEB 80CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.1% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 12.7
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 11.4
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W280 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W280

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $129
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback