PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 45.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A97 R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150626 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Dec 10 '18 at 16:29 |
Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
Run User | TUR-User |
Background CPU | 17% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$100
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
|
59.8%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.11.2
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.7%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 58 27 7 31 11 MB/s
|
36.2%
Below average
|
|||
Hitachi HTS543232L9A300 320GB-$45
166GB free
Firmware: FB4OC4FC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 27 25 25 26 MB/s
|
18.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
305GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 135 125 137 136 134 MB/s
|
78.5%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
29.4%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 865x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 645x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 438x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 186x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 160x |
RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples | 118x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $358 |