Asrock X58 Extreme

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X58 Extreme (all builds)
Memory	4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110425
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Dec 10 '18 at 14:35
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	53%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 93.7 1-Core 89.7 2-Core 160 70% 115 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 424 43% 347 Pts	64-Core 414 26% 414 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3160) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.22 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	52% Above average	Lighting 65 Reflection 65.6 Parallax 58.8 53% 63.2 fps	MRender 73.5 Gravity 62.4 Splatting 52.3 50% 62.7 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 60GB 60GB 267 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0816C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 48 17 24 18 18 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.6% Poor	Read 235 Write 200 Mixed 10.3 SusWrite 53.8 28% 125 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 32.1 4K Mixed 1.2 55% 19.2 MB/s	DQ Read 30.4 DQ Write 18.2 DQ Mixed 0.4 7% 16.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80 31,610 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 124GB free Firmware: 3.AAD SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 10 10 11 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	Read 68.3 Write 70.5 Mixed 42.3 SusWrite 10.7 36% 48 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 43%
WD Blue 250GB (2008)-$80 11,055 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 36GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 10 10 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	7.97% Terrible	Read 17 Write 10.3 Mixed 11 SusWrite 10.5 9% 12.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 90% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 7.97% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 6 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	32.8% Below average	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 10.7 MC Mixed 9.5 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 10.9 SC Mixed 9.9 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 60.4 66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X58 Extreme Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock X58 Extreme

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	48x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	23x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	22x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	11x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	11x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	9x

SSD
AGILITY2 60GBOCZBench 36%, 652 samples	9x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x

RAM
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	31x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	15x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $207

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16