Asus P8H77-V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics22.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-V  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121012
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 10 '18 at 08:10
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 92.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 204
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 400
53% 399 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8421) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1527 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 387.92
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Lighting 26.5
Reflection 26.2
Parallax 33.2
22% 28.6 fps
MRender 35.7
Gravity 31.1
Splatting 27.5
25% 31.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 374
Write 371
Mixed 249
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 98.9
4K Mixed 34.6
135% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 29.4
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 40.9
45% 71.6 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 104%
Toshiba MK1002TSKB 1TB-$141
54GB free
Firmware: MT4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 73 74 73 75 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 63.3
Write 92.3
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 74.2
54% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 83%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB
2GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 7.3 9.6 10 8.2 10 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
9.12% Terrible
Read 23
Write 7.3
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 9.2
12% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.1
85% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 9.12%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905474-037.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
59.8% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 18.4
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H77-V Builds (Compare 988 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-V - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $566
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback